This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sonelokimab in adults with moderate to severe HS. Following a Screening Period of up to 28 days, each participant will enter a Placebo-controlled Period of 16 weeks (Part A) and subsequently a Crossover/Maintenance Period of 36 weeks (Part B). In Part A subjects will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to sonelokimab 120 mg or placebo. In Part B, participants who were initially randomized to placebo will cross over to sonelokimab and will receive this treatment for the remainder of the study. An End of Treatment (EOT) Visit will be performed at Week 52. After the EOT Visit, all participants who complete Week 52 will be offered the opportunity to enter an optional long-term open label extension (OLE) study under a separate protocol. For participants who do not progress to the OLE study, a Safety Follow-up Visit will be required 8 weeks after the last dose of study treatment.

This study if for patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) or a related poorly differentiated sarcoma that has spread from where it first started to other places in the body or it cannot be removed by surgery. This study compares the effect of pembrolizumab plus doxorubicin to doxorubicin alone in treating patients. Doxorubicin damages the cell's DNA and may kill tumor cells. Doxorubicin also blocks a certain enzyme needed for cell division and DNA repair. A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attach the cancer and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Adding pembrolizumab to the standard chemotherapy, doxorubicin, may help patients with UPS or a related poorly differentiated sarcoma live longer without having disease progression. The duration of the study will be about 12 years, with 6 months of active treatment for those receiving doxorubicin alone and 2 years active treatment for those receiving doxorubicin and pembrolizumab. Each participant will be in follow up for 10 years. Some of the main side effects are nausea, vomiting, low blood count, fatigue and mild diarrhea.

This phase III study evaluates whether a new drug, dostarlimab, can delay or reduce the risk of cancer returning when administered for a year, shortly after receiving a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CRT). This study will enroll adults diagnosed with head and neck cancer who are treated with CRT. This study is divided into three parts: the screening period begins shortly after CRT and lasting 4-6 weeks where tests will be conducted to determine eligibility, followed by a 12-month treatment period where participants will receive either dostarlimab or an inactive substance (salt solution) with no effect on your body (placebo), and a follow up period when they will continue to be assessed to see if their cancer has returned or gotten worse. Participants may be on the study for approximately up to 5 years in total. The main risks are anaemia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Alternatives to this treatment is standard of care CRT because for this type of head and neck cancer, at the present time, there are no other approved therapies administered shortly after CRT that may prevent or delay the return of the cancer. The study benefit is dostarlimab may help slow or stop the growth of your cancer.

The purpose of this study is to explore whether a non-invasive form of ear stimulation called transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) can manage symptoms in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Additionally, this study also uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to capture images of participants' brains and apply an image processing method called INSCAPE to track brain state changes during taVNS treatment in ASD. We will recruit up to 16 participants with ASD.

This study is being done to see if injections in different locations can help to minimize chronic cough. This is done through the injection of an anti-inflammatory medication (steroid) into your upper arm muscle. The procedure takes less than 5 minutes. There has not yet been a study completed using arm muscle injections. The safety profile of arm muscle injections is expected to be the same as the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) injection which is in the neck is already used at MUSC in regular practice. This is the same medication and the same dosage as the arm injection in this study. By better understanding if this treatment helps improve chronic cough, an additional treatment option could be utilized for this patient population. SLN injections are usually only performed by fellowship trained laryngologists (an extra specialized year of training after ENT residency). However, if arm muscle injections are found to be equivalent in treating chronic cough, general ENT physicians could likely provide this treatment to their patients without the need to see a specialized laryngologist. This study will evaluate safety and effectiveness of the arm muscle injection. Steroids are investigational for the purpose of this study.

This study is for subjects that have been diagnosed with mantle cell lymphoma that has spread and has not responded to treatment. This study is testing an "investigational" (not yet FDA approved) study drug called glofitamab. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects, good or bad, of glofitamab (experimental arm) versus bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) or rituximab plus lenalidomide (R-Len;the control arm) on subjects with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Your total time in the study and the number of assessments in the follow up visits, will depend on how your MCL responds to study treatment. This could range from 1 day to more than 24 months. The screening period may last up to 28 days (4 weeks) and may involve more than one visit to the clinic.

This study is enrolling subjects who are referred for a ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. VT is an abnormal heart rhythm that comes from the lower chambers of the heart. An ablation is a procedure to treat abnormal heart rhythms by identifying where the abnormal heart rhythm is starting and then scarring the tissue as a way to stop them. In this study the scars are being made by freezing the tissue. This is called cryoablation. This study will use the Adagio VT Cryoablation System (vCLAS™ Catheter and Console) to perform the cryoablation. This system is considered investigational meaning it has not been approved for use outside of this study by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Study participation will last about one year and include the following visits: screening/baseline, procedure, pre discharge, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. There will also be a telephone call at day 7 post ablation procedure. The study will also collect data including medical history and medications, physical exam findings, data from the procedure, echocardiogram (ultrasound test of the heart, electrocardiogram or ECG (test that captures the electrical activity of the heart) and cardiac MRI. The primary study risks are those related to the ablation procedure including pain, abnormal heart rhythms, low or high blood pressure, and blood vessel or heart muscle damage. There is potential benefit as the procedure may eliminate the abnormal heart rhythm and the information gained may help others with this condition in the future.

Millions of children are victims of maltreatment each year in the United States. Research on home visiting programs show that child maltreatment can be prevented; however, these programs struggle to reach families in need and provide high quality care. SafeCare is a sustainable and effective home visiting child maltreatment prevention program, serving over 8,000 families each year. This study will examine the feasibility and implementation of a hybrid in-person/virtual delivery model for SafeCare with 12 home visiting providers and 40 caregivers to inform how home visiting programs are delivered to maximize reach to families, improve family outcomes, and decrease harm to children.

This is a Phase 3, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 3-arm, multiple dose level study to investigate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous injections of amlitelimab in participants aged 12 years and older with moderate-to-severe AD who are on background topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors and have had an inadequate response to prior biologic or oral JAKi therapy. There will be up to 13 visits including up to a 4-week screening period, a 36 week treatment period, and a post-treatment safety follow up period or a long-term Safety Study for 16 weeks. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to the following study arms: amlitelimab Q4W, amlitelimab Q12W, and placebo Q4W.

For this pilot study, children diagnosed with ADHD starting stimulant treatment for the first time, or have not received stimulant treatment in the prior 6 months, in rural settings will be the focus of efforts to improve time to optimal symptom control, in an effort to maximize the treatment benefit for the academic year. We anticipate that more frequent provision of information by families and teachers to medical providers, enabled by technology and remote monitoring tools, will encourage more rapid improvement in symptom burden. This would be achieved through timely, even weekly, titration of medication per the current treatment guidelines, which is only possible with symptom reports.

The goals of this pilot study are 2-fold:
• Evaluate caregiver and teacher utilization of the RAMP platform early in the treatment course of ADHD
• Evaluate provider utilization of the RAMP platform in everyday practice and management of children early in the treatment course of ADHD