A Phase 2, Multicenter, Double-blind, Extension Study to Evaluate the Effects of Sotatercept for the Treatment of Combined Postcapillary and Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension (Cpc-PH) due to Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Date Added
May 27th, 2025
PRO Number
Pro00143751
Researcher
Daniel Silverman

List of Studies

Keywords
Cardiovascular, Pulmonary Hypertension
Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and how well the medication sotatercept works versus placebo in treating Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction. The study will also look at information obtained from the tests performed as part of the study to see if subjects have improvement in symptoms of heart failure. Participation in this study will last approximately 26 months. During the study period subjects will be asked to attend regular study visits with the research coordinator. These visits will include such activities as blood tests, questionnaires, physical evaluation by a study doctor, a right heart catheterization with exercise, echocardiogram, and 6 minute hall walks. There will be 35 visits as part of participation in this clinical trial.

Participants will be randomized to either the treatment group (and receive the medication) or the control group (and not receive the medication). Subjects will have a 2:1 chance of receiving the study medication during their participation in the trial. The treatment assignment is determined by randomization, where a computer selects at random which treatment group you will be in (like drawing straws). Neither the subject, nor the blinded personnel will know which group subjects are in. Neither the subject nor the study doctor will decide what group subjects are assigned. Participants from the placebo group in CADENCE who enter HARMONIZE at Visit 9a will be randomized 1:1 to one of the active treatment groups. Participants from an active treatment group in CADENCE entering HARMONIZE after Visit 9a will be allocated to continue in the same treatment group (ie, sotatercept dose level) as in CADENCE.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Madison Johnson
843-792-4615
johme@musc.edu

A multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil in patients with symptomatic heart failure with severely reduced ejection fraction

Date Added
April 8th, 2025
PRO Number
Pro00143419
Researcher
Brian Houston

List of Studies


Keywords
Cardiovascular, Heart
Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if the investigational drug/study medicine (omecamtiv mecarbil) can reduce the risk of the effects of heart failure (HF), hospitalization, transplantation, or death. It is hoped that the study medicine increases the heart's ability to pump blood throughout the body, but we need to learn more about its effect in patients who suffer the most from HF symptoms. "Investigational" means that the study medicine is still being tested in research studies and has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study drug will be taken by mouth twice daily.

Participation in this study will last for approximately 3 years, however, participation could last from a few weeks to a few years depending on your time of enrollment. These visits will include physical exams, blood draws, electrocardiograms (ECG), echocardiogram (Echo), blood draws, questionnaires along with receiving the study drug. Participants will receive the study drug and have a 2 week wash out period to ensure tolerance. From there, participants will be randomized to either the treatment group (and receive the medication) or the control group (and not receive the medication). The treatment assignment is determined by randomization, where a computer selects at random which treatment group you will be in (like drawing straws). Neither the subject, nor the blinded study personnel will know which group subjects are in. Neither the subject nor the study doctor or study staff will decide what group subjects are assigned.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Shaquanda Goodwine
843-876-5783
shr37@musc.edu

Safety and Efficacy of the Alleviant No-Implant Interatrial Shunt in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Date Added
March 25th, 2025
PRO Number
Pro00142732
Researcher
Brian Houston

List of Studies


Keywords
Cardiovascular, Heart
Summary

This study is enrolling subjects with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction meaning the heart does not pump enough blood to meet the body's needs. This study is researching an investigational device (study device) called the Alleviant ALV1 System. Investigational means it has not been approved for commercial use by the Food and Drug Administration. (FDA) This study will test the safety and effectiveness of the Alleviant ALV1 System. The Alleviant ALV1 System is intended to create a shunt (an opening) in the heart to allow for proper blood flow through the heart which may improve your symptoms. No device is left in your heart it is just used to create the shunt. This is a randomized study which means subjects are assigned by chance to either have the study device create this shunt or not have the study device create the shunt. Randomization is 50/50 meaning there is a 50% chance to have the study device create a shunt and a 50% chance the study device will not be used. Using the study device to create the shunt is performed during a right heart catheterization (RHC) so all subjects will undergo the RHC but only 50% will have the shunt. Neither the subjects nor the study doctor will know which group subjects are randomized to but other study staff will know in the event this information is needed. All subjects will stay overnight in the hospital after the procedure. Other study related procedures include echocardiograms - ultrasound test of the heart, electrocardiograms (ECG) - a tracing of the heart's electrical activity, blood work, questionnaires, 6 minute hall walk test, and assessments of heart failure status. Risks include risks related to the study device including blood vessel damage from placing the device in the vein to get to the heart, risks from the right heart catheterization such as bleeding or bruising, abnormal heart beats, and risks related to study related procedures. There may be risks that are not known at this time. Participation in this study is expected to last about 60 months and include approximately 15 in person visits and 3 telephone calls.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Shaquanda Goodwine
843-876-5783
shr37@musc.edu

Posterior Wall Substrate Modification Using Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Date Added
March 13th, 2025
PRO Number
Pro00142437
Researcher
Rachel Kaplan

List of Studies

Keywords
Cardiovascular, Heart
Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmia in which the heartbeat becomes irregular due to abnormal electrical signals in the upper chambers of the heart, called the atria. This leads to ineffective pumping of blood by the atria. Complications related to atrial fibrillation are heart failure, stroke, heart palpitations and fatigue. This study is motivated by the need to address the increasing prevalence of AF, which is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide. While treatment options for AF include the use of antiarrhythmic drugs which are a group of medications used to treat irregular heartbeats, and catheter ablation procedures, the latter have been associated with significantly better outcomes. Participation in this study consists of 2 phases, 1- randomization 2- ablation procedure and follow-up period.
The randomization to the different groups is considered the research part of the study. Subjects will have equal chance of being randomized (like tossing a coin) to one of two AF ablation treatment groups. All follow up will be according to stand of care practices. Risks include stroke, pericarditis, acute and delayed perforation, hemolysis, acute kidney injury, and coronary artery spasm.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Krista Szymanski
843-876-5783
szymankr@musc.edu

A Comparative Effectiveness Study in Heart Transplant Patients of Rejection Surveillance with Cell-free DNA versus Endomyocardial Biopsy (ACES-EMB)

Date Added
February 25th, 2025
PRO Number
Pro00141118
Researcher
Adrian Van Bakel

List of Studies


Keywords
Cardiovascular, Heart, Transplant
Summary

This study is an open label, Comparative Effectiveness Research study in patients who receive a heart transplant. Subjects will be enrolled into the study while under evaluation for heart transplantation or on the transplant waiting list prior to heart transplantation. All subjects will follow the center's standard of care surveillance schedule from transplant through 4 weeks post-transplantation. The study objective is to compare the effectiveness of rejection surveillance of heart transplant recipients with Prospera dd-cfDNA to rejection surveillance with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in the first post-transplant year.
The Prospera™ test is a non-invasive test intended to detect and quantify the fraction of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) to supplement management and surveillance of allograft rejection in patients who have undergone organ transplantation. The subjects may undergo blood draws, echocardiogrphys, medical history and physical exams, antibody testing, nuclear imaging, and MRI as apart of the study. The study period will be during the first 12 months post-transplant. Quality of life questionnaires will be completed at week 4, month 6 and month 12 post-transplant.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Madison Johnson
8437924615
johme@musc.edu

Selective Pulmonary-artery Intervention to Reduce Acute Right-heart tEnsion-II

Date Added
February 11th, 2025
PRO Number
Pro00141326
Researcher
Thomas Todoran

List of Studies


Keywords
Cardiovascular
Summary

This study is asking for volunteers who have been diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). PE is a blood clot that blocks and stops blood flow to an artery in the lung. PE usually results from a blood clot in the leg that travels to the lung. Patients with PE may have shortness of breath, chest pain and/or an irregular heartbeat. This study will use a device known as the Vertex Pulmonary Embolectomy System. The Vertex Pulmonary Embolectomy System is a medical device which is indicated for use in the pulmonary arteries for the non-surgical removal of blood clots from blood vessels. The Vertex System has not yet been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but is approved for use in this study for PE removal. Your study doctor will inform you about the risks that are related to your PE procedure. The risks associated with the study include loss of confidentiality and unknown risks. There will be no benefit to you, but it is hoped the information gained will add to the understanding of treatment options for others in the future. You do not have to participate to have your condition treated. This study will take 30 days to complete.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Kara Loutzenhiser
843-792-1238
loutzenh@musc.edu

A Randomized Comparison of Cleerly Coronary Artery Disease Stage-Based Care Versus Risk Factor-Based Care for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events

Date Added
January 7th, 2025
PRO Number
Pro00140945
Researcher
Marc-Andre Cornier

List of Studies

Keywords
Cardiovascular, Diabetes, Heart
Summary

This clinical research study is enrolling adults with diabetes, prediabetes or metabolic syndrome. The purpose of the study is to learn more about preventing cardiovascular disease. A heart CT scan will be done at screening and then 2 years later. Qualified participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Participants in the usual care group, will continue to receive care from usual health care provider. In the personalized care group, participants will receive additional health care from a remote cardiologist led team which will individualize treatment based on Cleerly CAD staging results of the heart CT scan. Study is expected to last 3 1/2 years on average but could be 2 - 5 years. Participation is free.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Lori Spillers
843-876-0977
spillerl@musc.edu

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using His/Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing with a Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead in Patients with Heart Failure (HF) with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% and with either a Wide QRS Complex (> 130 ms) or with/anticipated > 40% Pacing Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) (Left vs Left RCT)

Date Added
December 17th, 2024
PRO Number
Pro00140157
Researcher
Anne Kroman

List of Studies

Keywords
Cardiovascular, Heart, Men's Health, Women's Health
Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with heart failure (HF, meaning a weak heart) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% and with an abnormal heart beat can benefit from having pacemaker leads placed in a different location in the heart. We know that people with a weak heart and an abnormal heart beat can benefit from having a pacemaker. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two treatments (A or B), both of which are standard of care heart pacing treatments:
A. Pacing the heart from two locations in the left ventricle (lower left chamber of the heart)
B. Pacing the heart from one of two other places in the heart (the "His" or the left bundle branch)

The purpose of this study is to compare side by side these two treatments and evaluate if one is better than the other.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Olivia Washington
843-792-5863
washoliv@musc.edu

Safety and Efficacy of Workflows of High-Volume Single Operators in a Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Implant Procedural Day: SAFE HV

Date Added
October 30th, 2024
PRO Number
Pro00137571
Researcher
Loren Morgan

List of Studies

Keywords
Cardiovascular, Heart, Vascular
Summary

The purpose of this research is to gather information about the effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) device procedures in patients using a Watchman device performed on days where doctors perform a large number of procedures.

The study primary outcome is to evaluate complications during the procedure up to 30 days after the procedure.

The final outcome is to determine successful placement within 31 - 90 days after implant.

Institution
MUSC Heart and Vascular Institute
Recruitment Contact
Jacqueline Sheriod-Scott
8032552927
sheriods@musc.edu

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Effect of Balcinrenone/Dapagliflozin, Compared with Dapagliflozin, on the Risk of Heart Failure Events and Cardiovascular Death in Patients with Heart Failure and Impaired Kidney Function

Date Added
October 8th, 2024
PRO Number
Pro00138745
Researcher
Vishal Rao

List of Studies

Keywords
Cardiovascular, Drug Studies, Heart, Kidney
Summary

We are doing this study to learn more about how effective, safe and tolerable an experimental drug called balcinrenone is when used in combination with dapagliflozin for treating patients with heart failure and impaired kidney function and also to better understand the studied disease and associated health problems. Dapagliflozin is an approved drug to treat patients with heart failure, chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Institution
MUSC
Recruitment Contact
Lauren Wakefield
843-876-5049
wakefila@musc.edu



-- OR --