This is an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) clinical research trial (referred to also as a trial or a research trial) sponsored by AtriCure, Inc (the Sponsor) to learn whether the use of the AtriClip® LAA Exclusion System to close off your left atrial appendage (LAA) during your heart surgery will reduce the risk of stroke. The AtriClip has not been well studied or approved by the FDA for stroke prevention; therefore, this procedure is considered investigational.
There are two classes of drugs for preventing blood clots in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), an irregular heartbeat, after cardiac surgery: antiplatelet drugs (like aspirin) and anticoagulants (blood thinners). This study aims to determine whether the addition of blood thinners to antiplatelet drugs will improve treatment outcomes in patients who develop AF after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.
In this study, you will be randomized (assigned to a group by chance--like flipping a coin) into one of 2 study groups; the assignment to receive the antiplatelet drug alone or the antiplatelet drug plus a blood thinner.
Before discharge from the hospital, you will undergo an electrocardiogram (ECG), which examines the electrical activity of your heart. At 1 and 2 months after randomization, you will receive a phone call from the study staff. At 3 months after randomization, you will return to the institution where you received your surgery for an in-person visit. At 6 months, you will receive a phone call from the study staff. Your total participation will be about 6 months.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the continuous use of negative pressure dressings for up to 14 days has similar benefits and risks to the continuous use for up to 7 days. The 3M study product being used in this study includes the PREVENA Plus Incision Management System with PREVENA Dressings (Peel & Place, Customizable and ARTHRO●FORM). The study product is considered investigational because it has not been approved by the FDA for continuous use for up to 14 days. It is currently approved for use for up to 7 days.
Exploring the Burn Wound Microbiome Using Next Generation Sequencing Technology study is designed to learn more about the microorganisms (bacteria and fungi such as yeast) that are present in traumatic burn wounds. We wish to learn how the make up of microbes differ between the wounded and uninjured skin. Currently, if a doctor wants to know which organisms exist in a burn wound, they would need to send a sample of the wound surface to be grown on a petri dish. Ultimately this system takes too long and may not identify all the organisms that may affect wound healing and as a result this method is no longer used for most burn wounds at most burn centers. Our study proposes to bridge this knowledge gap by using newly available techniques collectively referred to as "Next Generation Sequencing technology" or NGS for short. NGS has the potential to provide more detailed and accurate information about the make up of the burn wound and has already been used as a tool in other parts of healthcare. The information gained from this study may potentially improve the care of future burn patients.
The purpose of this research study is to find out if AMDS is safe and effective in the treatment of acute dissection (sudden tear). For patients whose aortic anatomy is suitable for treatment with AMDS, the use of this device may promote healing of the aortic walls and possibly reduce the need for additional aortic surgeries. If conventional surgery, in combination with AMDS, is effective, it is believed that this could lead to improved aortic healing; an improvement in healing could reduce the risk of hospitalization and reoperation in the chest compared to conventional surgery alone.
The study will compare the effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance and endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for the management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and low-grade dysplasia (LGD).
ELEVATE is a device study that will look at the effectiveness of the Pipeline™ Shield Device in treating adults with acutely ruptured brain aneurysms that are shallow and are deemed unsuitable for treating with both clipping (placing a metal clip over the neck of the aneurysm) and coiling (stopping the blood flow into the aneurysm by packing it tightly with small pieces of metal). The primary goals for this study are a complete blocking of the blood vessel without narrowing of the blood vessel and no rebleeding or retreatment of the aneurysm through the 180-day follow-up.
After signing the consent subjects will be treated with the device which is a flow diverter (is a braided metal mesh cylinder that would be implanted across the opening (or ‘neck') of the aneurysm slow down or stop the blood flow into the aneurysm, causing the blood within the aneurysm to clot). The study will follow subjects from consent until the 365-day follow up post procedure. There are some risks associated with study participation such as death, stroke, and device failure. All other risks will be discussed with subjects at time of consent.
This study is for participants who have tricuspid regurgitation, a condition in which your heart's tricuspid valve does not close tightly which causes blood to flow backwards in the incorrect direction. This condition increases the workload on the heart and if left untreated, it can increase the risk of worsening heart failure. In this study, a device called the PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System will be used to treat the tricuspid regurgitation. The PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System is an investigational device meaning it has not been approved for commercial use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In this study participants will be randomized, meaning randomly assigned like drawing straws, in a 2:1 fashion to either receive the PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System (treatment group) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) (control group). OMT means your medications will be adjusted as needed to provide the most benefit possible. Participants randomized to the OMT group may be eligible to receive the device after completing 2 years of follow up. Participants not eligible for randomization may be eligible for the registry portion of the study if approved by the sponsor. The registry arm participants will not be randomized but will undergo the procedure to place the device.
Participation in this study will last about 5 years and involve up to 15 visits for those in the treatment or registry group and 11 visit for those in the control group. Study related procedures include a right heart catheterization (test to measure the pressures in the heart), echocardiograms (ultrasound test of heart), electrocardiogram or ECG (test of the heart's electrical system) blood work, questionnaires, hall walk test, and physical exam.
The purpose of this research is to compare the risks and benefits of two different procedures used to help patients with mitral valve regurgitation (also known as MR). MR is a condition where the valve does not close fully when it is supposed to, and some blood can then leak back into the left atrium instead of circulating to the rest of the body. The treatment options this study will compare are: (1) transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (abbreviated as TEER; which is a catheter procedure for repairing the mitral valve that doesn't require surgery to open up the heart) and (2) mitral valve repair surgery, which is an open-heart surgical procedure. There are no new or "experimental" procedures being tested in this study: both treatment options are well-established treatments and are regularly performed in patients who have MR.